Opens in a new tab
Contact UsRequest a Demo

The Hidden Cost of Renting Your Patient Financing Program

Dmytro Voronenko
Embedded Lending for Healthcare Providers

Let’s stay in touch.Subscribe to our newsletter here.

I’ve noticed a distinct pattern in conversations with health and wellness providers across North America. Most of them already offer financing. Patients apply, get approved, and pay over time. The program works well enough that nobody wants to touch it.

The catch is that the healthcare organization itself doesn’t own the program. A third-party lender does. That lender takes a cut of every loan, decides who gets approved, sets the rate, and puts its own name on the paperwork your patient signs.

Let’s put a number on the first part.

Say a practice finances $10M in procedures a year. At a 5% fee, that’s $500,000 gone. Most providers aren’t getting 5%. Fees in the 10% to 15% range are common in patient financing, which puts that same practice somewhere between $1M and $1.5M a year.

Here’s the part that should bother you: that number isn’t fixed. It grows every time your practice does. New location, new provider, influx of patients. All of it makes next year’s invoice bigger. You’re handing over a percentage of your own growth to a company that didn’t do anything to earn it.

Software doesn’t work like that. You pay to run the platform, not to push each loan through it. Finance twice as much next year and your cost stays roughly flat. The gap between those two lines is your margin, and it widens the bigger you get.

The fee is just the part you can see on an invoice. The lender also controls the answers your patients hear. When a patient gets denied for a treatment plan you know they can afford, or gets quoted a rate that makes them walk, that decision came from someone else’s risk model. You absorb the cancellation. They keep the fee on everyone who got through.

So what’s the better approach? Stop renting and bring the program in-house on a platform that lets you own the patient experience from application to payoff.

Value of Autonomy and Speed in Embedded Lending

When you’re on someone else’s platform, every change is a support ticket. Want to run a seasonal promotion, extend terms on high-value procedures, or adjust your approval floor? You submit a request and wait.

Owning the program means you can move without asking permission.

In practice, this means you can:

  • Adjust financing terms as market conditions and interest rates shift, in days instead of quarters.
  • Launch white-labeled, localized products from a single dashboard, so marketing and sales can move on their own timeline.
  • Test and retire ideas cheaply. Try a promotional rate for one procedure line, watch what happens, and change it next week if it doesn’t land.

That speed is worth more than it sounds. Every financing decision you’re currently deferring to a vendor’s roadmap is a decision your competitors can make this quarter.

What Changes When You Move Off a Third-Party Program

Plenty of providers stay with an outside lender because running credit yourself sounds complicated and risky. That assumption made sense when the alternative was building a lending system from scratch. That reasoning doesn’t hold up anymore.

A modern platform drops financing into your existing patient workflow and hands you the controls: interest rates, eligibility criteria, repayment terms, branding, and compliance reporting that meets standard regulatory requirements out of the box.

What your patients notice is smaller and more important than any of that:

  • Financing lives at the point of care, so fewer treatment plans stall or get cancelled.
  • Approvals run on your rules. You’ve treated these patients for years. You know which ones are good for it, and now that judgment counts.
  • One conversation instead of a handoff. Nobody gets sent to a middleman’s website to find out whether they can afford their own treatment.

That shows up as higher acceptance rates, fewer abandoned treatments, and patients who stay with you longer.

Worth saying plainly: the right model depends on your strategy. Some providers land on a hybrid, keeping an outside lender for the riskiest slice of applicants while running the rest of the book themselves. That’s a reasonable place to end up. What’s not reasonable is paying a percentage on every loan by default because nobody’s run the numbers lately.

No Demolition Required

A common fear is that adopting a new platform means tearing down what you have and starting over. That shouldn’t be the case.

A platform built to integrate with your existing infrastructure (CRM, LOS, ERP, payment processor) gives patients a smooth end-to-end experience with no delays and no handoffs. By working alongside the systems you already use, you protect past investments and build on your own history and workflows.

That history matters more than most providers realize. Years of patient payment behavior sitting in your systems is exactly the data an intelligent platform needs to drive AI-based credit decisioning and sharper approvals. Your current lender has never seen any of it. You’ve been paying them to guess at something you already know.

With enough pre-configured functionality, programs that once took months to plan can be deployed, tested, and scaled in weeks or even days.

What This Looks Like When It Works

Access Fertility is a UK-based IVF provider whose patients were often held back by cost. The third-party financing options on the table came with misaligned incentives and payment plans too rigid for the way IVF actually works.

So they stopped renting and became the lender. They built their own program on TurnKey Lender, which let them design products no outside lender would have offered them: 0% interest IVF financing and refundable programs with money-back guarantees.

What happened next:

  • 40% to 45% of patients now use financing, and patient uptake rose 5% to 10%.
  • The underwriting cycle went from 14 days to about 3, with instant decisions on complete applications.
  • The loan book scaled from £10M into the tens of millions with no matching increase in headcount. About 30 people run the whole operation.

As their CFO put it: “The operational improvements we’ve seen by using a system like TurnKey Lender mean we can take on millions of pounds in loan book without additional headcount.”

Financing stopped being the thing standing between their patients and treatment. It became the reason more of them said yes. Read the whole story here.

In-House Financing With TurnKey Lender

TurnKey Lender is the preferred platform healthcare providers use to bring financing in-house. You set the rates, the terms, and the approval rules. Your brand is on the application. The platform runs origination, credit decisioning, servicing, payments, reminders, and reporting, and it connects to the practice management software, EMR, and payment gateways you already use.

You don’t have to cut over to find out whether it works for you. Practices can run TurnKey Lender in parallel with their existing third-party provider and compare approval rates, patient feedback, and cost on real applications before changing anything.

Ready to see what this could look like for your practice? Book a call to learn more.  

Dmytro Voronenko
Dmytro Voronenko
Co-Founder

Dmytro is a fintech entrepreneur and the Co-Founder of TurnKey Lender, a global provider of end-to-end lending automation solutions. With over 15 years of experience at the intersection of finance and technology, Dmytro helps businesses unlock growth through smarter credit infrastructure, branded BNPL, and AI-powered lending. He writes and speaks about the future of digital finance, embedded credit, and how lenders can turn innovation into real competitive advantage.

Share: